*Result*: The effect of bile salts stress on the biology and transcriptome characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus under low salt environment.
Calder T et al (2014) Structural and regulatory mutations in Vibrio parahaemolyticus type III secretion systems display variable effects on virulence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 361(2):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12619. (PMID: 10.1111/1574-6968.126194675326)
Carter DM et al (2006) Interactions between TonB from Escherichia coli and the periplasmic protein FhuD. J Biol Chem 281(46):35413–35424. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M607611200. (PMID: 10.1074/jbc.M607611200)
Chang YT et al (2024) Low salinity stress increases the risk of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection and gut microbiota dysbiosis in pacific white shrimp. BMC Microbiol 24(1):275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03407-0. (PMID: 10.1186/s12866-024-03407-011271031)
Dong T et al (2021) Involvement of the heat shock protein HtpG of Salmonella typhimurium in infection and proliferation in hosts. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:758898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.758898. (PMID: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.7588988635147)
Ducarmon QR et al (2019) Gut microbiota and colonization resistance against bacterial enteric infection. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00007-19. (PMID: 10.1128/mmbr.00007-196710460)
Enos-Berlage JL et al (2005) Genetic determinants of biofilm development of opaque and translucent Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol Microbiol 55(4):1160–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04453.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04453.x)
Getz LJ et al (2023) Attenuation of a DNA cruciform by a conserved regulator directs T3SS1 mediated virulence in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Nucleic Acids Res 51(12):6156–6171. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad370. (PMID: 10.1093/nar/gkad37010325908)
Gil MM et al (2006) A modified Gompertz model to predict microbial inactivation under time-varying temperature conditions. J Food Eng 76(1):89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.05.017. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.05.017)
Huang M et al (2023) Functional characterization of FeoAB in iron acquisition and pathogenicity in Riemerella anatipestifer. Microbiol Spectr 11(4):e01373–e01323. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01373-23. (PMID: 10.1128/spectrum.01373-2310434265)
Kaval KG et al (2023) Membrane-localized expression, production and assembly of Vibrio parahaemolyticus T3SS2 provides evidence for transertion. Nat Commun 14(1):1178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36762-z. (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-023-36762-z9977878)
Khan F et al (2020) Motility of Vibrio spp.: regulation and controlling strategies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(19):8187–8208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10794-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s00253-020-10794-7)
Klebba PE et al (2021) Iron acquisition systems of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens define TonB-dependent pathways to novel antibiotics. Chem Rev 121(9):5193–5239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01005. (PMID: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c010058687107)
Kumar R et al (2020) Bile acid and bile acid transporters are involved in the pathogenesis of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease in white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Cell Microbiol 22(1):e13127. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.13127. (PMID: 10.1111/cmi.13127)
Letchumanan V et al (2017) Bile sensing: the activation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence. Front Microbiol 8:728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00728. (PMID: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.007285399080)
Li L et al (2019) Molecular mechanisms of Vibrio parahaemolyticus pathogenesis. Microbiol Res 222:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.03.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.03.003)
Li W et al (2020) Insights into the role of extracellular DNA and extracellular proteins in biofilm formation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Front Microbiol 11:813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00813. (PMID: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.008137248202)
Li M et al (2023) Comparative genomic analysis reveals the potential transmission of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from freshwater food to humans. Food Microbiol 113:104277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2023.104277. (PMID: 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104277)
Li X et al (2024a) Environmental magnesium ion affects global gene expression, motility, biofilm formation and virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biofilm 7:100194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100194. (PMID: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.10019410990858)
Li Y et al (2024b) Construction of the Flagellin F mutant of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and its toxic effects on silver pomfret (Pampus argenteus) cells. Int J Biol Macromol 259:129395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129395. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129395)
Liu J et al (2021) Bacteriostatic effects of benzyl isothiocyanate on vibrio parahaemolyticus: transcriptomic analysis and morphological verification. BMC Biotechnol 21(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-021-00716-4. (PMID: 10.1186/s12896-021-00716-48479925)
Liu X et al (2022) Synergistic antibacterial effect and mechanism of high hydrostatic pressure and mannosylerythritol Lipid-A on Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 135:108797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108797. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108797)
Mateus C et al (2023) Evaluation of bile salts on the survival and modulation of virulence of Aliarcobacter butzleri. Antibiotics 12(9):1387. (PMID: 10.3390/antibiotics1209138710525121)
Muthukrishnan S et al (2022) Expression of AHPND toxin genes (pirAB), quorum sensing master regulator gene (luxR) and transmembrane transcriptional regulator gene (toxR) in Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi during infection of Penaeus vannamei (Bonne, 1931). Aquaculture 551:737895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737895. (PMID: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737895)
Namadi P, Deng Z (2023) Optimum environmental conditions controlling prevalence of vibrio parahaemolyticus in marine environment. Mar Environ Res 183:105828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105828. (PMID: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105828)
Nguyen TV et al (2021) Metabolic responses of Penaeid shrimp to acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease caused by vibrio parahaemolyticus. Aquaculture 533:736174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736174. (PMID: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.736174)
Oliveira F et al (2022) Involvement of the Iron-Regulated loci Hts and FhuC in biofilm formation and survival of Staphylococcus epidermidis within the host. Microbiol Spectr 10(1):e0216821. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02168-21. (PMID: 10.1128/spectrum.02168-218754135)
Olmo-Mira MF et al (2004) NapF is a cytoplasmic iron-sulfur protein required for Fe-S cluster assembly in the periplasmic nitrate reductase. J Biol Chem 279(48):49727–49735. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M406502200. (PMID: 10.1074/jbc.M406502200)
Portaliou AG et al (2016) Type III secretion: building and operating a remarkable nanomachine. Trends Biochem Sci 41(2):175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.09.005. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.09.005)
Saito S et al (2015) Epidemiological evidence of lesser role of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH)-related hemolysin (TRH) than TDH on Vibrio parahaemolyticus pathogenicity. Foodborne Pathog Dis 12(2):131–138. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2014.1810. (PMID: 10.1089/fpd.2014.1810)
Schiffmann S et al (2024) Bile acids activate the antibacterial T6SS1 in the gut pathogen vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01181-24. (PMID: 10.1128/spectrum.01181-2411448226)
Sestok AE et al (2022) A fusion of the Bacteroides fragilis ferrous iron import proteins reveals a role for FeoA in stabilizing GTP-bound FeoB. J Biol Chem 298(4):101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101808. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.1018088980893)
Sun F et al (2012) Molecular characterization of direct target genes and cis-acting consensus recognized by quorum-sensing regulator apha in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044210. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.00442103440409)
Veshareh MJ, Nick HM (2021) A novel relationship for the maximum specific growth rate of a microbial guild. FEMS Microbiol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnab064. (PMID: 10.1093/femsle/fnab064)
Wadhwa N, Berg HC (2022) Bacterial motility: machinery and mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 20(3):161–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00626-4. (PMID: 10.1038/s41579-021-00626-4)
Xiao B et al (2025) Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) regulates innate immunity and intestinal microbial homeostasis against vibrio parahaemolyticus in shrimp. Aquaculture 596:741814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741814. (PMID: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741814)
Yang X et al (2024) Effects of chlorogenic acid-grafted-chitosan on biofilms, oxidative stress, quorum sensing and c-di-GMP in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Int J Biol Macromol 273:133029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133029. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133029)
Ye C et al (2021) Deletion of vp0057, a gene encoding a Ser/Thr protein Kinase, impacts the proteome and promotes iron uptake and competitive advantage in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Proteome Res 20(1):250–260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00361. (PMID: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00361)
Yildiz FH, Visick KL (2009) Vibrio biofilms: so much the same yet so different. Trends Microbiol 17(3):109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.12.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.12.0042729562)
Zhang X et al (2023) Transcriptomic analysis reveals the antibiofilm mechanism of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus MS1 against vibrio parahaemolyticus. LWT 176:114529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114529. (PMID: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114529)
Zhou Y et al (2024) VPA0198, a GGDEF domain-containing protein, affects the motility and biofilm formation of vibrio parahaemolyticus and is regulated by quorum sensing associated regulators. Microb Pathog 195:106882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106882. (PMID: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106882)
Zhou Y et al (2025a) GefB, a GGDEF domain-containing protein, affects motility and biofilm formation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and is regulated by quorum sensing regulators. Gene 933:148968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2024.148968. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148968)
Zhou Y et al (2025b) Antibiofilm mechanism of mouse Gastrointestinal stimulation against vibrio parahaemolyticus under bile salt culture. Microb Pathog 200:107339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107339. (PMID: 10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107339)
Zhu W et al (2024) The role of RcpA gene in regulating biofilm formation and virulence in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Int J Food Microbiol 418:110714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110714. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110714)
Zou AJ et al (2023) Molecular determinants for differential activation of the bile acid receptor from the pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Biol Chem 299(4):104591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104591. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.10459110140157)
451W47IQ8X (Sodium Chloride)
0 (Bacterial Proteins)
*Further Information*
*Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a foodborne pathogen that can cause severe gastroenteritis. After entering the human intestine through contaminated seafood (1.00% NaCl) V. parahaemolyticus will encounter a physiologically related dual pressure environment: low salinity and elevated bile salts (0.03%-0.30%). Although bile salts can affect V. parahaemolyticus under optimal salinity conditions (3.00% NaCl), little is known about their effects on paralysis under low salt conditions (0.90% NaCl) in the intestinal stress environment. This research uniquely simulated this intestinal niche using 0.90% NaCl-0.10% bile salts, revealing its effects on growth kinetics, motility, biofilm formation, and transcriptome responses. The main findings include: significant inhibition of growth (prolonged the lag time (LT)), decreased the maximum specific growth rate (µ<subscript>max)</subscript>), swimming ability, and biofilm formation; But it enhances the ability to swarming; And unique transcriptome reprogramming. In addition, transcriptome sequencing revealed that swarming related genes, biofilm related genes, and T3SS virulence genes were significantly down regulated, while iron metabolism and swimming related genes were significantly up-regulated. It is crucial that KEGG enrichment indicates that the ribosomal pathway may be the central regulatory hub for observed biofilm and motility inhibition. This research provides the first comprehensive analysis of the effects of bile salts on intestinal related low salinity, providing important insights into the intestinal adaptation and pathogenic mechanisms of V. parahaemolyticus.
(© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)*
*Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.*