*Result*: The neuropathological mechanisms underlying the inborn errors of lysine metabolism.

*Optimal lysine catabolism is essential for the proper growth and development of mammals. Lysine is degraded through either the saccharopine or pipecolate pathway, processes characterized by distinct tissue specificity and subcellular compartmentalization. Although controversy persists, accumulating evidence suggests that the saccharopine pathway serves as the predominant route for lysine degradation in the mammalian brain. Pathogenic variants of genes encoding the enzymes involved in lysine catabolism lead to severe inborn errors of metabolism, including hyperlysinemia-II, pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy-ALDH7A1, and glutaric aciduria type I, which are biochemically characterized by the systemic accumulation of neurotoxic metabolites. Patients with the aforementioned disorders exhibit apparent neurological symptoms, ranging from cognitive impairment to severe encephalopathy, indicating that the dysregulation of lysine metabolism has deteriorative impacts on brain development and function. It is worth noting that a subset of patients still suffers from developmental delay and chronic neurological dysfunction, despite the amelioration of acute seizures or encephalopathic crises resulting from a combination of a lysine-restricted diet and pharmacotherapy. This elusive neuropathology has prompted increasing research aimed at identifying the pivotal regulatory roles of enzymes in neural functions and the neurotoxic effects of lysine metabolites in the brain. Here, we summarize current insights into the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the neurological manifestations of lysine metabolism disorders. A comprehensive understanding of the association between biochemical abnormalities and neurometabolic deficiencies has profound implications for refining therapeutic strategies to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in affected patients.
(Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)*

*Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.*