*Result*: Conditional Versus Unconditional Covariate Effects in Pharmacometric Models: Implications for Interpretation, Communication, and Reporting.

Title:
Conditional Versus Unconditional Covariate Effects in Pharmacometric Models: Implications for Interpretation, Communication, and Reporting.
Authors:
Jonsson EN; Pharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden., Jönsson S; Pharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden., Hansson E; Pharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden., Nyberg J; Pharmetheus AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Source:
CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology [CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol] 2026 Feb; Vol. 15 (2), pp. e70203.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101580011 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2163-8306 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21638306 NLM ISO Abbreviation: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2015- : Hoboken, NJ : Wiley
Original Publication: New York, NY : Nature Pub. Group
References:
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 Sep;79(3):241-57. (PMID: 16023764)
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2025 Feb 22;52(2):18. (PMID: 39985638)
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 May;13(5):743-758. (PMID: 38415822)
Pharm Stat. 2011 Jan-Feb;10(1):14-26. (PMID: 20041468)
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2019 Jun;46(3):273-285. (PMID: 31020450)
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Feb;47(1):5-18. (PMID: 31679083)
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Aug;75(2):85-94. (PMID: 15212851)
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;13(8):1297-1308. (PMID: 38937897)
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;11(10):1283-1293. (PMID: 35670230)
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;8(6):415-427. (PMID: 30980481)
Pharm Res. 1999 May;16(5):709-17. (PMID: 10350015)
Pharm Stat. 2017 Jan;16(1):45-54. (PMID: 27580760)
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2004 Apr;31(2):109-34. (PMID: 15379381)
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2026 Feb;15(2):e70203. (PMID: 41603487)
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 May;13(5):710-728. (PMID: 38566433)
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;79(1):132-47. (PMID: 24962797)
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Oct;47(5):485-492. (PMID: 32661654)
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb 15;177(4):292-8. (PMID: 23371353)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: covariate effects; dosing recommendations; inference; pharmacometric models; statistics
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20260128 Date Completed: 20260128 Latest Revision: 20260131
Update Code:
20260131
PubMed Central ID:
PMC12849216
DOI:
10.1002/psp4.70203
PMID:
41603487
Database:
MEDLINE

*Further Information*

*This work investigates how correlations between covariates influence the estimation of their effects in pharmacometric models. The focus is on quantifying the impact on conditional and unconditional covariate effect estimates and assessing the consequences for model interpretation, communication, and dosing recommendations. A theoretical framework was used to describe the mathematical relationship between conditional and unconditional coefficients. This was verified by simulations across a wide range of covariate correlation strengths and relative covariate effect sizes. The practical consequences of misinterpreting conditional effects were evaluated in the context of dose selection and a priori dose individualization. As predicted by theory, covariate correlation had a substantial effect on the conditional covariate coefficient estimates, while unconditional estimates remained stable. Interpreting conditional covariate effects in isolation led to incorrect conclusions about dosing needs and introduced bias and imprecision in individual dose predictions. In contrast, both the complete conditional model and the unconditional model gave accurate predictions when applied appropriately. Unconditional covariate effects offer greater interpretability, making them more suitable for communicating individual covariate impacts in drug labels, publications, and forest plots. We demonstrate that conditional effects are highly sensitive to model context and covariate correlation, making them poor proxies for the unconditional effect, which is often the quantity of interest for dosing and communication. To minimize misinterpretation, unconditional effects should be reported when describing the influence of individual covariates, while the complete conditional model should be used for simulations and exposure predictions. This dual approach can improve clarity and reduce the risk of misunderstanding in model-informed decision-making.
(© 2026 Pharmetheus AB. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)*