*Result*: Home-based extended rehabilitation for older people with frailty (HERO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial with health economic analysis and process evaluation.
Original Publication: Winchester, UK : National Co-Ordinating Centre for HTA, c1997-
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. (PMID: 23395245)
Age Ageing. 2019 Sep 1;48(5):665-671. (PMID: 31297511)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;56(2):138-47. (PMID: 12654408)
Trials. 2011 Jun 08;12:143. (PMID: 21651805)
Trials. 2021 Nov 8;22(1):783. (PMID: 34749783)
Rev Clin Gerontol. 2012 Feb;22(1):68-78. (PMID: 27226701)
Can Geriatr J. 2020 Sep 01;23(3):210-215. (PMID: 32904824)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;(10):CD010775. (PMID: 26513331)
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):e804-e811. (PMID: 34080751)
CMAJ. 2015 Aug 11;187(11):799-804. (PMID: 26009583)
J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(1):3-11. (PMID: 35122084)
Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3. (PMID: 3403500)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD002214. (PMID: 17443516)
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):e555-e560. (PMID: 31308000)
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):81-8. (PMID: 22176852)
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2009;35(4):253-9. (PMID: 20180678)
Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):152-62. (PMID: 16279137)
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 02;7:68. (PMID: 17475006)
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Mar;36(2):197-204. (PMID: 18519285)
Age Ageing. 2014 Sep;43(5):687-95. (PMID: 24742587)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. (PMID: 1991946)
Trials. 2012 Jun 21;13:86. (PMID: 22721452)
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Oct;20(10):1190-1198. (PMID: 31564464)
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. (PMID: 21479777)
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Dec;30(4):1-26. (PMID: 41389043)
Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23. (PMID: 20392703)
JAMA. 2007 Apr 25;297(16):1772-4. (PMID: 17456818)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):752-9. (PMID: 20056387)
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Nov;65(640):e731-8. (PMID: 26500320)
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Aug 30;2:30. (PMID: 29062525)
Value Health. 2023 Feb;26(2):163-169. (PMID: 35965226)
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 20;36(26):4094-4105. (PMID: 28783884)
Age Ageing. 1993 Nov;22(6):419-24. (PMID: 8310887)
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 9;7(2):e014127. (PMID: 28183809)
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;135:337-54. (PMID: 26477921)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 28;14(1):42. (PMID: 28351367)
J Aging Res. 2011 Apr 04;2011:569194. (PMID: 21584244)
Age Ageing. 2023 Feb 1;52(2):. (PMID: 36746389)
QJM. 2015 Dec;108(12):943-9. (PMID: 25778109)
Local Abstract: [plain-language-summary] When older people with frailty are admitted to hospital, they often lose independence. Short-term National Health Service rehabilitation can improve independence during hospital stays or following return home. However, independence often deteriorates again once this rehabilitation ends. For these older people who already require some support at home, this further loss of independence can be devastating. This often leads to the person being readmitted to hospital, becoming dependent on homecare services and possibly needing to move to a care home. We wanted to see if a home exercise programme supported by physiotherapists, providing extended rehabilitation after hospital admission, could help these older people after discharge home. Between December 2017 and August 2021, 740 older adults (aged 65 and over) with frailty agreed to take part in our research. We approached people who were being discharged from hospital or short-term National Health Service rehabilitation services after an illness or injury, either just before they were discharged or within 14 days of discharge. People were recruited from multiple hospitals and allocated randomly (by chance) to the exercise programme or usual care. 410 participants received our exercise programme. The other 330 participants received their usual care only. We collected information from participants on their health, well-being and circumstances for 12 months. We compared the two groups to see if the group who received the exercise programme benefited from it. We observed physiotherapists providing the programme to see how it was delivered, looked at the cost-effectiveness of the programme and asked participants about their experiences. We found that although the exercise programme was delivered largely as planned, and was acceptable to most participants, it did not improve health or well-being and was not cost-effective. We do not recommend that the Home-based Older People’s Exercise programme should be provided as extended rehabilitation for older people with frailty after discharge home from hospital or short-term rehabilitation services.
*Further Information*
*Background: Half of older people in hospital have frailty and are at increased risk of re-admission or death following discharge. Although short-term rehabilitation can reduce early re-admissions, benefits are attenuated over time. It is unknown whether extended rehabilitation for older people with frailty can improve outcomes.
Trial Design: Pragmatic, multicentre, individually randomised controlled parallel-group superiority trial with economic evaluation and embedded process evaluation.
Methods: Participants: Eligible participants were 65 years or older with mild/moderate/severe frailty (score of 5-7 on Clinical Frailty Scale) admitted to hospital with acute illness or injury, then discharged home directly or from intermediate care (post-acute care) rehabilitation services. People with significant cognitive impairment and care home residents were among those ineligible. Recruitment took place from December 2017 to August 2021, with follow-up till August 2022. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned (1.28 : 1) to the Home-based Older People's Exercise programme - a 24-week home-based manualised, progressive exercise intervention delivered by National Health Service therapists as extended rehabilitation, or usual care (control). Randomisation occurred after the participant had been discharged from hospital or intermediate care. Participants were not masked to allocation. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was physical health-related quality of life, measured using the physical component score of the modified Short Form 36-item health questionnaire at 12 months. Secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months included physical and mental health-related quality of life, functional independence, death, hospitalisations and care home admissions. Researchers involved in data collection were masked to allocation. Data sources: Primary and secondary outcomes were obtained via self-report questionnaire at 6 and 12 months. Hospitalisations and deaths were collected from routine healthcare data.
Results: We randomised 740 participants (410 Home-based Older People's Exercise, 330 control) across 15 sites. Four hundred and seventy-nine (64.7%) participants completed 12-month follow-up. One hundred and eighty-eight Home-based Older People's Exercise participants (45.9%) completed 24 weeks of intervention delivery. Over half of participants completed more than 75% of prescribed exercises. Intention-to-treat analyses (258 Home-based Older People's Exercise participants, 208 control participants for primary outcome) showed no evidence that Home-based Older People's Exercise was superior to control for 12-month physical component score (adjusted mean difference -0.22, 95% confidence interval -1.47 to 1.03; p = 0.73). There was some evidence of a higher rate of all-cause hospitalisations in the control arm (incidence rate ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.25; p = 0.05), but no evidence of differences in other outcomes. The process evaluation found the intervention was largely delivered as intended and proved acceptable to most participants. The economic analysis showed incremental costs of Home-based Older People's Exercise plus usual care of GB£1401 (mean per participant), compared with usual care alone. There was a 0.024 quality-adjusted life-year improvement in Home-based Older People's Exercise compared to control. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £58,375.
Limitations: This trial was delivered during especially challenging circumstances that included the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined outcomes taking account of this but detected no difference in primary or secondary outcomes, providing reassurance that COVID-19 was unlikely to have influenced trial results.
Conclusions: Based on our findings, we do not recommend routine commissioning of extended rehabilitation for older people with frailty after discharge home from hospital or intermediate care, following an acute admission with illness or injury.
Future Work: Future work should consider how existing core intermediate care and community rehabilitation services should be best organised and delivered to ensure that older people with frailty feel ready for discharge from rehabilitation, and are enabled to maintain their independence.
Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 15/43/07.*