*Result*: Repetition Suppression for Mirror Images of Objects and Not Braille Letters in the Ventral Visual Stream of Congenitally Blind Individuals.

Title:
Repetition Suppression for Mirror Images of Objects and Not Braille Letters in the Ventral Visual Stream of Congenitally Blind Individuals.
Authors:
Korczyk M; Department of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków 30-060, Poland maksym.korczyk@gmail.com m.szwed@uj.edu.pl., Rączy K; Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany., Szwed M; Department of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków 30-060, Poland maksym.korczyk@gmail.com m.szwed@uj.edu.pl.
Source:
ENeuro [eNeuro] 2026 Jan 22; Vol. 13 (1). Date of Electronic Publication: 2026 Jan 22 (Print Publication: 2026).
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Society for Neuroscience Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101647362 Publication Model: Electronic-Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2373-2822 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 23732822 NLM ISO Abbreviation: eNeuro Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: [Washington, DC] : Society for Neuroscience, [2014]-
References:
Prog Brain Res. 2001;134:427-45. (PMID: 11702559)
Cogn Psychol. 1989 Apr;21(2):233-82. (PMID: 2706928)
Sci Adv. 2023 Apr 5;9(14):eadf6140. (PMID: 37018408)
Cortex. 2021 Sep;142:342-356. (PMID: 34352637)
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):687-9. (PMID: 17515898)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7939-44. (PMID: 20395549)
J Vis. 2016 Sep 1;16(11):3. (PMID: 27599373)
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):742-9. (PMID: 21111052)
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Mar 10;33(6):3142-3170. (PMID: 35834902)
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0155394. (PMID: 27187496)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Oct 1;35(10):1593-1616. (PMID: 37584592)
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33136. (PMID: 22438894)
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;11:173. (PMID: 28979197)
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):698-709. (PMID: 12880800)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):246-53. (PMID: 21549634)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;19(7):374-82. (PMID: 26072689)
Curr Biol. 2020 Aug 3;30(15):3039-3044.e2. (PMID: 32559449)
Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):143-56. (PMID: 17610823)
J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 15;43(46):7868-7878. (PMID: 37783506)
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 3;31(31):11305-12. (PMID: 21813690)
Brain. 2013 Sep;136(Pt 9):2769-83. (PMID: 23831614)
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Dec 9;33(24):11526-11540. (PMID: 37851850)
Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):739-48. (PMID: 16956773)
Elife. 2016 Mar 15;5:e10762. (PMID: 26976813)
J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Feb 15;213(1):32-8. (PMID: 23246777)
Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;202(3):669-79. (PMID: 20131046)
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Sep;25(9):2507-16. (PMID: 24642421)
Neuroimage. 1997 Oct;6(3):218-29. (PMID: 9344826)
Neuroimage. 2011 May 1;56(1):330-44. (PMID: 21296170)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Nov;5(11):853-62. (PMID: 15496863)
Nat Commun. 2012;3:1284. (PMID: 23250414)
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:252-62. (PMID: 25281887)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1813-21. (PMID: 20162607)
J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7848-56. (PMID: 21613498)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):254-62. (PMID: 21592844)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jul;7(7):293-299. (PMID: 12860187)
Elife. 2024 Dec 04;13:. (PMID: 39630852)
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Mar;51(4):601-12. (PMID: 23270676)
Arch Ital Biol. 2008 Sep;146(3-4):133-46. (PMID: 19378878)
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jul 25;21(7):e3001930. (PMID: 37490508)
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Apr;66:101360. (PMID: 38394708)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 May;21(5):307-310. (PMID: 28385460)
Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:154-162. (PMID: 29475079)
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 10;5:703. (PMID: 25071669)
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1837-48. (PMID: 19770045)
J Vis. 2008 Dec 17;8(10):13.1-19. (PMID: 19146355)
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jan;53:39-46. (PMID: 24184438)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jan;202:102960. (PMID: 31862578)
Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1506-8. (PMID: 10688803)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Sep;21(9):637-648. (PMID: 28821345)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jul;31(7):1065-1078. (PMID: 30938589)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Nov 1;37(11):2010-2052. (PMID: 40423514)
Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):363-8. (PMID: 21333539)
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1325-35. (PMID: 15850749)
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 May;145:157-65. (PMID: 26827098)
Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):384-98. (PMID: 17964253)
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31094. (PMID: 39730799)
Neuroimage. 2004 Dec;23(4):1256-70. (PMID: 15589091)
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Mar 10;33(6):2426-2440. (PMID: 35671478)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Braille; breaking mirror invariance; congenitally blind individuals; mirror invariance; reading; shape recognition
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20251209 Date Completed: 20260122 Latest Revision: 20260128
Update Code:
20260130
PubMed Central ID:
PMC12834325
DOI:
10.1523/ENEURO.0002-25.2025
PMID:
41365683
Database:
MEDLINE

*Further Information*

*Mirror invariance is the cognitive tendency to perceive mirror-image objects as identical. Mirrored letters, however, are distinct orthographic units and must be identified as different despite having the same shape. Consistent with this phenomenon, a small, localized region in the ventral visual stream, the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA), exhibits repetition suppression to both identical and mirror pairs of objects but only to identical, not mirror, pairs of letters ( Pegado et al., 2011), a phenomenon named mirror invariance "breaking". The ability of congenitally blind individuals to "break" mirror invariance for pairs of mirrored Braille letters has been demonstrated behaviorally ( de Heering et al., 2018, Korczyk et al., 2024). However, its neural underpinnings have not yet been investigated. Here, in an fMRI repetition suppression paradigm, congenitally blind individuals (8 males and 10 females) recognized pairs of everyday objects and Braille letters in identical ("p" and "p"), mirror ("p" and "q"), and different ("p" and "z") orientations. We found repetition suppression for identical and mirror pairs of everyday objects in the parietal and ventral-lateral occipital cortex, indicating that mirror-invariant object recognition engages the ventral visual stream in tactile modality as well. However, repetition suppression for identical but not mirrored pairs of Braille letters was found not in the VWFA, but in broad areas of the left parietal cortex and the lateral occipital cortex. These results suggest that reading-related orthographic processes in blind individuals depend on different neural computations than those of the sighted.
(Copyright © 2026 Korczyk et al.)*

*The auhors declare no competing financial interests.*