*Result*: Long-term seizure outcomes of epilepsy surgery in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy caused by hippocampal sclerosis based on preoperative ictal versus non-ictal video-EEG: A 10-year follow-up.
*Further Information*
*Introduction: Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) is a frequent cause of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). In these cases, anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is an effective treatment in well-selected patients. While ictal video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG) remains the gold standard for localizing the epileptogenic zone, some studies have suggested that non-ictal video-EEG, when concordant with MRI, may be sufficient to perform ATL.
Objective: To compare long-term outcomes in patients who underwent ATL with ictal video-EEG versus non-ictal video-EEG by presenting one of the first comprehensive 10-year follow-up analyses.
Methods: An observational, ambispective, longitudinal, and analytic cohort was used to compare the long-term seizure outcomes in patients with MTLE-HS who underwent ATL with ictal video-EEG versus non-ictal video-EEG preoperative monitoring evaluation at a neurology and neurosurgery hospital.
Results: A total of 122 patients with MTLE-HS who underwent ATL were included. Preoperative ictal video-EEG was available for 73 patients (59.8 %), and 49 patients (40.2 %) were evaluated using non-ictal video-EEG. MRI concordance was observed in 62 patients (84.9 %) of the ictal and 41 patients (83.7 %) of the non-ictal group. Overall, 78 patients (63.9 %) were seizure-free: 47 (64.4 %) in the ictal group and 31 (63.3 %) in the non-ictal group (p = 0.89). No significant difference in seizure freedom was observed between groups over a 10-year follow-up (log-rank p = 0.24).
Conclusion: In patients with MTLE-HS, ATL guided by non-ictal video-EEG with concordant clinical and MRI findings could achieve seizure freedom outcomes comparable to those obtained with ictal video-EEG. These results support the use of non-ictal evaluations in resource-limited settings.
(Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)*
*Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors report there are no competing interests to declare. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.*