*Result*: Assessing the use of 3D-printed traps to evaluate Hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) infestation levels.

Title:
Assessing the use of 3D-printed traps to evaluate Hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) infestation levels.
Authors:
Dunham K; Annis Water Resources Institute, Grand Valley State University, Muskegon, MI, USA., Geller K; Annis Water Resources Institute, Grand Valley State University, Muskegon, MI, USA., Sanders M; Annis Water Resources Institute, Grand Valley State University, Muskegon, MI, USA.; Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Division of Agriculture Resources Management, Madison, WI, USA., Partridge C; Annis Water Resources Institute, Grand Valley State University, Muskegon, MI, USA.
Source:
Journal of economic entomology [J Econ Entomol] 2025 Dec 01; Vol. 118 (6), pp. 2971-2982.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 2985127R Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1938-291X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00220493 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Econ Entomol Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2015- : Oxford : Oxford University Press
Original Publication: College Park Md : Entomological Society of America
References:
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Oct;10(4):1261-1264. (PMID: 26622475)
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jul;31(5):e02335. (PMID: 33780592)
J Econ Entomol. 2024 Aug 12;117(4):1537-1544. (PMID: 38825579)
J Econ Entomol. 2025 Dec 1;118(6):2971-2982. (PMID: 40652457)
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Mar;17(2):221-229. (PMID: 27768244)
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 18;12(1):2853. (PMID: 35181721)
J Vis Exp. 2020 Nov 5;(165):. (PMID: 33226032)
Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13939. (PMID: 35603473)
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:171810. (PMID: 38513869)
Elife. 2022 Nov 10;11:. (PMID: 36354219)
J Econ Entomol. 2023 Feb 10;116(1):168-180. (PMID: 36421054)
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 11;18(8):e0290036. (PMID: 37566591)
Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 07;14(2):e10898. (PMID: 38333100)
Mol Ecol Resour. 2023 Feb;23(2):396-409. (PMID: 36151931)
J Fish Biol. 2021 Feb;98(2):399-414. (PMID: 32154579)
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 14;14(3):e0213849. (PMID: 30870505)
Grant Information:
PSB-IS21-0303-040 Michigan Invasive Species Grant Program
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: forest health; hemlock; invasive species; monitoring
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250713 Date Completed: 20251211 Latest Revision: 20251213
Update Code:
20260130
PubMed Central ID:
PMC12698224
DOI:
10.1093/jee/toaf174
PMID:
40652457
Database:
MEDLINE

*Further Information*

*Hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae (Annaand), is an invasive insect that has devastated millions of eastern hemlocks, Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrière, in eastern North America since the 1950s. In Michigan, Hemlock woolly adelgid was first detected in 2015 and has spread to several counties in west Michigan. Conservation practitioners are managing Hemlock woolly adelgid through a statewide, landscape-level pesticide management plan. The traditional method of using randomized branch sampling to estimate infestation levels is time-consuming but allows managers to monitor how Hemlock woolly adelgid responds to treatments. Our main objective was to determine if alternative sampling techniques produce data that is equivalent to field methods, such as randomized branch sampling, for estimating infestation levels. We selected 6 treated sites and 3 untreated sites in west Michigan. During the fall and winter of 2022, we estimated the densities of the sistens generation using a randomized branch sampling method, and during the summer of 2023, we deployed 5 traps at each site to capture adelgid crawlers and performed qPCR analysis to quantify Hemlock woolly adelgid DNA. To determine if trap data could be used as a method to assess Hemlock woolly adelgid infestation levels, we evaluated the relationships between (i) crawler counts and qPCR values (gene copies/reaction), (ii) sistens counts and qPCR values, and (iii) sistens counts and crawler counts. We found that trap data (ie qPCR values and adelgid crawler counts) had comparable correlations with traditional methods, particularly during the peak crawler period. However, the strength of these relationships is influenced by factors such as infestation level and temporal variation.
(© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.)*